OK so regular readers of this blog know that I have a very popular entry with the title
That one article completely changed the course and direction of my life, got me international press and indirectly a literary agent. When I used the term, I used it in a lighthearted attempt to describe the sexual behaviors of the entire city of NYC. To quote myself.
I find frustrating is that if you really want to get to know a guy first before having sex with him, it seems like there is no end to the women who will jump into bed with them. And this isn’t to say that only men do this, as women engage in the same behavior as do people of all sexual orientations and gender identifications.
So although some have misinterpreted my use of the term slut, I do indeed refer to every adult male, female, gay, straight, bisexual and transgendered person indirectly as a slut. Not to say that every adult in NYC engages in slutty behavior, but people from every sexual orientation and gender specification certainly do. Why people felt obligated to associate the female gender to the term “slut” is beyond me, but I meant slut in terms of people who engage in promiscuous behavior. Some men and women proudly identify as sluts so given the context, I really didn’t see what the fuss was about. But now that we have my history with the term “slut” addressed I would like to move on to Rush Limbaugh.
Rush Limbaugh decided to personally attack Sandra Fluke, a law student at Georgetown University who testified before the congressional committee on the cost of birth control. For sharing her personal story about the high cost of her birth control Rush labeled her both a slut and a prostitute. I am not going to address the name calling or equating a woman using birth control as a prostitute because it is pointless to even bother. But I am going to break down his arguments.
Hormonal birth control is prescribed to many woman for health related purposes that are not related to preventing pregnancy. NO ONE in the press wants to address this. Birth control pills are prescribed for many female reproductive health problems such as – ovarian cysts, heavy periods, irregular periods, painful periods, hormone imbalances, light or infrequent periods, early onset menopause even cystic acne. In many cases, the pill is effective in most cases for reducing these symptoms, it is not exclusively taken to prevent pregnancy.
The cost of hormone based birth control when compared to condoms. Rush and his staff “crunch the numbers to try to show that hormone based birth control pills are not cost-effective. But comparing condoms to birth control is like comparing a raincoat to an umbrella. According to AmericanPregnancy.com hormone based birth control pills have a 93-97% success rate when used in real life conditions. And according to the same site, condoms have a 14-15% failure rate. So solely basing birth control on condom use would result in more unplanned pregnancies. Also according to AmericanPregnancy.com the cost of delivering a baby could reach as high as $6000-8000 which does not include prenatal care or the extensive costs of a complicated pregnancy, especially one requiring a Caesarian section.
The Tax Payer is on the hook for birth control Rush also claimed that the “tax payer” is somehow paying for Sandra Fluke’s birth control but I don’t know where he is getting that other than thin air. The subject being debated on congress had nothing to do with the federal government spending any tax dollars on anyone’s insurance. If Rush would like to debate that topic he is free to do so, but this particular issue has to do with either the employer or the health insurance company paying for birth control, it says absolutely nothing about the government paying for anything. It is designed to set national standards for essential healthcare benefits. And using that logic, anyone in a health insurance plan is paying for another member’s care. Pay $8,000 in yearly premiums, but use only $2000 worth of care? Then you are paying directly into the profits of the health insurance company but also for another member’s heart surgery, cancer treatment or for a premature infant clinging to life in an incubator. That is just how health insurance works, most people pay more into it than they get back and a few patients cost the plan more than they put in. If it didn’t work this way the companies wouldn’t be able to turn a profit.
The women are having too much sex and that is why they need birth control – The way hormonal birth control works a woman has to take it for an entire month and stay on it for months whether she is having sex daily or once a year. The amount of sex is irrelevant.
Married couples should not have hormonal birth control as an option for helping them control the size of their families? Rush doesn’t address this directly but the vast majority of women including Catholic women in the US use some form of birth control. The Guttmacher Institute in a new report, Countering Conventional Wisdom: New Evidence on Religion and Contraceptive Use. The report showed that, “among all women who have had sex, 99% have ever used a contraceptive method other than natural family planning” Are married women who use birth control sluts in Rush’s world view? Most married women only have one sexual partner, not exactly a slut.
And of course his last ridiculous statement simply made to get press more than anything else. -
Since “WE” are paying for it, these women should video tape their sexual encounters. According to the proposed legislation, the health insurance providers or the employers would be paying for the birth control, NOT the tax payer. And even with that insane logic, then Rush might as well start producing some of his own tapes, after all a health insurance plan most likely helped pay for his Viagra. So everyone paying a premium to the same insurance company better start demanding videos of his erections, just because they helped pay for them.
And if he is going to make personal attacks – Rush Limbaugh – married four times, yet has no children, three of his wives were of child baring age, so either he is sterile, or someone was using birth control. No one knows this for sure, perhaps he successfully used the rhythm method for each wife and through some miracle no one got pregnant. Rush who has had problems with abusing prescription drugs himself, was caught entering the country with the erectile dysfunction drug Viagara. So is it acceptable for a health insurance company to pay for a drug that certainly would increase the sexual capacity for a man, but not for birth control for a woman? That seems like ridiculous hypocrisy to me and most Americans would agree, in fact according to A Kaiser Family Foundation survey nearly 2/3 of American Adults favored Obama’s birth control policy.
Rush Limbaugh is a blow-hard who says crazy things to get attention and press. He might have finally gone too far. Attacking half of the adult population directly is not always the best method for winning over converts to his cause. But we shouldn’t tell him that, let him alienate half the voting population. Seems like a winning strategy to me!